So for example, a broccoli microgreen, some of which are germinating happily on my shelf as we speak - I heard that a microgreen of a vegetable contains all the nutrients of a full-grown veg? It sounds wonderful, but is it true? More on-topic, I grow microgreens in a sprouting tray with cotton shoelaces threaded all around and cut ends sticking down into the bottom of the tray which is filled with water, so they wick water to the greens. They grow so much better than when I had to remember to water them!
Please excuse me it this has already been said on this thread, but something to take into consideration is the source of information, and the quality of the source.
It is important to ask, who and what, exactly, determined the nutritional content of any specific food, and where did the sample foods come from?
Ever wonder why the cartoon character Popeye ate spinach to gain strength? During the late 1920s and early 1930s, childhood disease due to malnutrition was rampant and fresh vegetables were costly for an impoverished urban mother. A federal government pamphlet was published and widely distributed, listing the nutritional value of many foods. It was a case of bad proofreading, because a misplaced decimal point attributed much more iron content to spinach than it actually has. It gained a false reputation as a superfood.
"Studies report" the headline reads, but it does not necessarily tell you that the "study" included only 50 college kids being paid ten bucks to answer a one page questionnaire.
In the final analysis, I give you this 1970s bumper sticker:
Eat Right, Exercise, Die Anyway